There are now literally decades of data on this question, and the answer is very clear: prevention does not save money. It does sometimes save lives, of course, it’s not bad medicine. It’s often very good medicine. But like a lot of good modern medicine, it’s very expensive. We can decide if it’s worth the cost or not, but let’s not ignore the cost, let alone imagine it will save us money.
The most recent serious scholarly review of the data on this question was an article in the journal Health Affairs earlier this year (here’s the link, but it requires a subscription). The author’s conclusion:
Over the four decades since cost-effectiveness analysis was first applied to health and medicine, hundreds of studies have shown that prevention usually adds to medical costs instead of reducing them. Medications for hypertension and elevated cholesterol, diet and exercise to prevent diabetes, and screening and early treatment for cancer all add more to medical costs than they save.
That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t pursue preventive medicine, it just means we shouldn’t pretend it’s going to reduce health care costs.
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
The Cost of Preventive Medicine
Posted by Freeven at -- 7:55 PM